mosaique.info logo
  1. home
  2. article
  3. US Supreme Court strikes down federal bump stock ban

US Supreme Court strikes down federal bump stock ban

ai generated text

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in favor of a challenge to a federal ban on bump stocks, devices that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire like machine guns. The ruling stems from the worst mass shooting in U.S. history, which occurred in October 2017 and in which most of the 22 guns used were equipped with bump stocks. The court's decision fell along ideological lines, with conservative justices voting in favor of the challenge and liberal justices dissenting. A Texas gun shop owner had challenged the ban, which was implemented during the Trump administration. The Biden administration has expressed support for the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives' decision to allow the accessories.

    1. The Senate judiciary committee's ongoing investigation into the supreme court's ethical crisis … makes it crystal clear that the highest court needs an enforceable code of conduct, because its members continue to choose not to meet the moment.
    1. A disgraceful decision by the corrupt supreme court that will results in the death of more Americans, especially children. Congress must act swiftly to pass a bump stocks ban. Time to organize.
    1. Weapons of war have no place on the streets of America, but Trump's Supreme Court justices have decided the gun lobby is more important than the safety of our kids and our communities.
    1. Today's decision strikes down an important gun safety regulation.
    1. By undoing this policy, the court is putting countless American lives at risk.
    1. President Trump has been and always will be a fierce defender of Americans' Second Amendment rights and he is proud to be endorsed by the NRA.
    2. The Court has spoken and their decision should be respected.
    1. This case asks whether a bump stock - an accessory for a semiautomatic rifle that allows the shooter to rapidly reengage the trigger (and therefore achieve a high rate of fire) - converts the rifle into a 'machinegun'. We hold that it does not and therefore affirm the lower court's ruling.
    1. Today, the Court puts bump stocks back in civilian hands. To do so, it casts aside Congress's definition of 'machinegun' and seizes upon one that is inconsistent with the ordinary meaning of the statutory text and unsupported by context or purpose.
US Supreme Court strikes down federal bump stock ban