- home
- article
- UN Embargo Violation Suspected in Sudan After French Weapons System Found
UN Embargo Violation Suspected in Sudan After French Weapons System Found
ai generated text
Amnesty International has brought attention to the fact that vehicles used in the conflict are equipped with French-made Galix defense systems, which are allegedly being used in violation of a United Nations arms embargo. Furthermore, it is reported that these Galix systems were fitted onto armored personnel carriers built by the United Arab Emirates. The use of these systems in the conflict raises concerns about the possible breach of international laws and regulations, as the UAE is legally allowed to import arms from France, but it is unclear if these systems were legally exported to Sudan.
The SAF and the RSF both think they can win the war in Sudan, escalating operations, recruiting new fighters and intensifying attacks. Some of their external backers, who provide weapons and other support, are enabling the slaughter. This must stop.
These deliveries were made in strict compliance with the export licenses granted to LACROIX and the associated end-user certificates.
The Galix suite is not only for the purpose of self-defence (passive action) but also to actively neutralise hostile personnel.
Any use [of Galix] in Darfur would be a clear breach of the UN arms embargo.
Our research shows that weaponry designed and manufactured in France is in active use on the battlefield in Sudan.
The UAE does not seem concerned by this, despite UN reporting in January concluding that there is credible evidence that the UAE was sending weapons to the RSF for Darfur, in contravention of the UN sanctions while the UAE was in the UN security council.
This is one of the most disturbing wars of the 21st century that we're seeing right now.
Neither side started this war with enough weapons stocks to sustain the fighting for this long. Outside weapons flowing in are what is keeping the fighting going. And advanced weapons, not just artillery and ammunition, have made the conflict that much more deadly and widespread.
Sudanese Army and Rapid Support Forces Conflict
- Aid Deliveries at Risk as Port Sudan Endures Third Day of Drone Strikes
- Genocide Case Dismissed Against UAE by International Court of Justice
- Clashes Erupt as Sudanese Paramilitaries Launch Drone Attack on Port Sudan Airbase
sources
- 1.Al Jazeera
- 2.The Guardian
- 3.Daily Sabah
- 4.CTV News
- 5.Le Monde
- 6.Agence France-Presse
- 7.Associated Press
- 8.Guardian
- 9.La Croix
- 10.Reuters
perspectives
countries
- 1.United Arab Emirates
- 2.Egypt
- 3.France
- 4.United Kingdom
- 5.Iran, Islamic Republic of
- 6.Russian Federation
- 7.Saudi Arabia
- 8.Sudan
- 9.Chad
- 10.Ukraine
- 11.United States
organizations
- 1.Amnesty International
- 2.Rapid Support Forces
- 3.KNDS
- 4.United Nations
- 5.Emirates
- 6.Lacroix Defense
- 7.Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project
- 8.Center for Humanitarian Health
- 9.Janjaweed
- 10.London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- 11.Nimr Ajban
- 12.Sudanese American Physicians Association
persons
- 1.Agnès Callamard
- 2.Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo
- 3.Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan
- 4.Abdulazim Awadalla
- 5.Hiba Morgan
- 6.Maysoon Dahab
- 7.Paul Spiegel
- 8.Algoney Hamdan Daglo Musa
- 9.Cameron Hudson
- 10.Justin Lynch
- 11.Kholood Khair
- 12.Nabil Abdallah
technicals
- 1.Galix System
- 2.APCs
- 3.Islam
- 4.Red Sea