mosaique.info logo
  1. home
  2. article
  3. Grenfell Tower demolition plan sparks renewed controversy eight years after London fire disaster

Grenfell Tower demolition plan sparks renewed controversy eight years after London fire disaster

ai generated text

The Grenfell Tower fire, which occurred nearly eight years ago, was the deadliest fire on British soil since World War II. The fire severely weakened the building and it must be dismantled, with construction of the apartment complex not set to start until the eighth anniversary of the tragedy. The demolition process will be a slow and precise "top down" approach, as opposed to using synchronized explosives or wrecking balls, which have not been used in the UK since the 1970s. The Grenfell Next of Kin (GNK) group, representing relatives of nearly half of those who died, is involved in the decision-making process.

    1. It is clear from conversations it remains a sacred site. It is also clear that there is not a consensus about what should happen to it.
    1. Do we wish the whole Tower could stand forever? Yes. Is that an option. Not from a structural point of view.
    1. Some sort of infrastructure from the building must stay... (as) a reminder to future generations.
    1. Explosives are a definite no-no. They can be used for tower blocks but it wouldn't be right for this particular structure with its history.
    2. The other issue with explosives is the fact that two London Underground lines run directly under the tower.
    1. It's been a long process. It needed to be a long process because the people most directly affected have had a lot of information fired their way: solicitors, getting their lives back in order, the inquiry, the criminal side as well. And then on top of that, the memorial.