mosaique.info logo
  1. home
  2. article
  3. Germany's Domestic Spy Agency Designates AfD as Right-Wing Extremist Party

Germany's Domestic Spy Agency Designates AfD as Right-Wing Extremist Party

ai generated text

Germany's national intelligence agency has classified the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) as an extremist entity that threatens democracy, labeling it a "confirmed right-wing extremist" force. The designation, made by the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution, allows the authorities to increase surveillance of the party, including by recruiting confidential informants, and could potentially revive discussion over a ban for the AfD. The party has been accused of being racist and anti-Muslim, and evidence has been gathered that suggests it works against Germany's democratic order.

    1. It aims to exclude certain population groups from equal participation in society, to subject them to treatment that violates the constitution, and thereby assign them a legally subordinate status.
    2. The AfD's ethnic and descent-based understanding of the people, which devalues ​​entire population groups in Germany and violates their human dignity.
    1. It is sad to see the state of democracy in our country when the established parties now resort to the most politically questionable means to act against the strongest opposition party.
    1. The AfD is being publicly discredited and criminalised shortly before change of government.
    2. The AfD will continue to defend itself legally against these defamatory statements that endanger democracy.
    1. They want a different country, they want to destroy our democracy. And we must take that very seriously.
    1. A party ban procedure has very high constitutional hurdles for good reasons. That should not be ruled out but we should continue to handle it very carefully. In any case, there is no automatism.
    2. The AfD represents an ethnic concept that discriminates against entire population groups and treats citizens with a history of migration as second-class Germans.
    1. Germany just gave its spy agency new powers to surveil the opposition. That's not democracy—it's tyranny in disguise.
    1. This should be a reason to finally seriously consider a ban procedure before it is too late.
    1. There is tension between a party's claim to chair positions based on its size and the freedom of conscience of the members of parliament.
    2. The ban is clearly defined: Article 21 of the Basic Law [Germany's constitution] provides the possibility for this from the outset. It must concern an active campaign against the free democratic order. The party's aim must be to overcome the political system.