- home
- article
- Birkenstocks are not considered art by a German court
Birkenstocks are not considered art by a German court
ai generated text
Birkenstock has filed a lawsuit against several companies that allegedly produced copycat versions of four popular sandal styles. The court in Germany rejected the company's claim that its sandals are copyright-protected works of applied art, instead ruling that they are practical design items.
For the copyright protection of a work of applied art — as for all other types of work — the level of design must not be too low.
The claims are unfounded because they [the sandals] are not copyright-protected works of applied art.
The production costs are extremely low but the sales price is often only just below the original. Counterfeiters make huge profits without taking any major risks because product piracy is not consistently prosecuted in many countries.
This is a setback, but we're not giving up.
We think the ruling is a missed opportunity for the protection of intellectual property in Germany.
Product piracy is a dirty business, with higher profit margins than the arms and drug trade.
sources
perspectives
countries
organizations
- 1.Birkenstock
- 2.Federal Court of Justice
- 3.New York Stock Exchange
- 4.Academy Awards
- 5.Dior
- 6.shoecom
- 7.Tchibo
persons
- 1.Kate Moss
- 2.Lina Khan
- 3.Margot Robbie
- 4.Britney Spears
- 5.Heidi Klum
- 6.Jochen Gutzy
- 7.Katy Perry
- 8.Manolo Blahnik
- 9.Steve Jobs
- 10.Thomas Koch
technicals
- 1.Barbie